Skip to content
Church Sound Calc
Menu

Microphones

Microphone Polar Pattern Chart

Last updated

Quick answer

A hypercardioid microphone rejects most at 110 degrees off axis and gives about 6 dB more gain before feedback than an omnidirectional. Cardioid nulls at 180 degrees and gains 4.8 dB, supercardioid nulls at 126 degrees and gains 5.7 dB. Wedge placement follows the null.

A polar pattern is the only microphone specification that directly buys you volume. Every other choice on a platform is about tone; this one is about how loud the system can run before it rings. The mechanism is simple: a microphone that ignores sound from some directions can be turned up further before it hears enough of a loudspeaker to start feeding back.

The number that quantifies it is random energy efficiency, which is the fraction of diffuse room sound the pattern accepts compared with an omnidirectional. A cardioid accepts one third, which is 4.8 dB of extra gain. A hypercardioid accepts one quarter, which is 6 dB. Those decibels are free, and they are thrown away every week by pointing the null at nothing in particular. Pattern choice by source is in the microphone type by source chart.

On this page
  1. What does each polar pattern reject, and where?
  2. Where should the monitor wedge go for each pattern?
  3. Which pattern does each catalog microphone use?
  4. What the specification does not tell you about patterns
  5. Where this chart does not apply

What does each polar pattern reject, and where?

The null angle column is the one to act on. It is measured from the front of the microphone, so 180 degrees means directly behind and 126 degrees means two directions, each 54 degrees either side of directly behind.

A hypercardioid has a random energy efficiency of 0.25, giving 6.0 dB more gain before feedback than an omnidirectional, with its deepest rejection at 110 degrees off axis rather than directly behind.

Polar patterns with rejection, null angles and feedback advantage
PatternRejection at 180 degreesNull anglesRandom energy efficiencyDistance factorGain before feedback
Omnidirectional0 dBNone1.001.00 dB, the reference
Subcardioid, wide cardioidAbout 10 dBNone, no true null0.551.3+2.6 dB
Cardioid20 dB or more180 degrees0.331.7+4.8 dB
SupercardioidAbout 12 dB126 degrees, two directions0.271.9+5.7 dB
HypercardioidAbout 6 dB110 degrees, two directions0.252.0+6.0 dB
Bidirectional, figure of eight0 dB, inverted polarity90 degrees, two directions0.331.7+4.8 dB
Half-cardioid, boundary20 dB or more180 degrees along the surface0.331.7+4.8 dB, plus boundary gain
Shotgun, lobarAbout 15 dB120 degrees, plus side lobes0.202.2+7.0 dB

Random energy efficiency is the fraction of diffuse room sound the pattern accepts relative to an omnidirectional. Distance factor is the square root of its reciprocal, and tells you how much further from the source the microphone can sit for the same ratio of direct to reverberant sound. Gain before feedback is the theoretical advantage in a diffuse field, which real rooms approach but rarely reach.

Where should the monitor wedge go for each pattern?

This is the practical payoff. Point the null at the loudest loudspeaker the microphone can see, and the free decibels arrive. Point it anywhere else and you have bought a directional microphone and used it as an omni.

A cardioid vocal microphone wants one wedge directly behind it at 180 degrees, while a supercardioid wants two wedges at 126 degrees, which is 54 degrees either side of directly behind.

Monitor wedge placement by microphone polar pattern
PatternWedge positionNumber of wedgesCommon mistake
CardioidDirectly behind the microphone, on the floor at 180 degreesOne, centredTwo wedges either side, which puts both in the live area.
SupercardioidTwo wedges at 126 degrees, so 54 degrees either side of straight backTwo, splayedOne wedge straight back, which sits in the rear lobe.
HypercardioidTwo wedges at 110 degrees, so 70 degrees either side of straight backTwo, splayed widerTreating it like a cardioid. The rear lobe is only 6 dB down.
OmnidirectionalNo safe position existsUse in-ears insteadExpecting a lavalier to survive a wedge at any angle.
BidirectionalDirectly to the sides, at 90 degreesTwo, at the sidesForgetting the rear is fully live and inverted in polarity.
Half-cardioid boundaryBehind the surface the microphone is mounted onOne, well backPlacing a floor wedge in front, where the hemisphere is fully live.
Headset, directionalBehind the wearer, and the wearer must not turn aroundOne, centredA roaming pastor who walks past the wedge while talking.

All angles are measured from the front axis of the microphone, not from the singer. If a vocalist turns to face the drummer, their microphone turns with them and the null moves off the wedge, which is why gain before feedback on a handheld is always worse than the specification suggests. In-ear monitoring removes the problem entirely and is the reason it is worth the money on a busy platform.

Which pattern does each catalog microphone use?

The microphones a church is most likely to own, sorted by pattern, so the wedge placement table above can be applied directly.

Most church vocal microphones are cardioid, including the Shure SM58 and SM57, while the Beta 58A is supercardioid and the Audix OM5 is hypercardioid, which is 1.2 dB more gain before feedback than the SM58.

Polar pattern by microphone, from the church AV catalog
MicrophonePatternTypeBest use on a church platform
Shure SM58 Pro XLR Dynamic Vocal MicrophoneCardioidDynamicThe default handheld vocal. One wedge directly behind.
Shure SM58S Pro XLR Dynamic Vocal Microphone with On/Off SwitchCardioidDynamicSame capsule with a switch, for a roaming or guest microphone.
Shure SM57 Pro XLR Dynamic Instrument MicrophoneCardioidDynamicSnare top and guitar amplifier. Never a vocal on a church platform.
Shure BETA 58A Supercardioid Dynamic Vocal MicrophoneSupercardioidDynamicA worship leader who needs more gain. Two wedges at 126 degrees.
AUDIX OM5 Hypercardioid Handheld Dynamic Vocal Microphone for Stage SingersHypercardioidDynamicThe most feedback-resistant handheld here. Wedges at 110 degrees.
Audix OM2 Dynamic Vocal MicrophoneHypercardioidDynamicBacking vocals on a loud platform.
AUDIX i5 Dynamic Instrument Microphone: Pro Snare Mic/Guitar Amp MicrophoneCardioidDynamicSnare and guitar cabinet. A durable alternative to the SM57.
Shure BETA 52A Kick Drum Microphone - Supercardioid Dynamic Mic with High Output Neodymium Element, Locking Stand Adapter, Durabl Steel Mesh Grille and Shock MountSupercardioidDynamicKick drum, inside the shell.
Shure BETA 56A Snare and Tom Microphone - Supercardioid Swivel-Mount Dynamic Drum Mic for Close Miking, Equipped with Shock Mount for Sound Isolation, Dynamic Locking Stand Adapter, Steel Mesh GrilleSupercardioidDynamicSnare and toms, on the swivel mount.
Shure BETA 91A Half-Cardioid Condenser Kick Drum MicrophoneHalf-cardioidCondenser, boundaryInside a kick drum, or flat on a pulpit surface.
Shure MX418/C Cardioid Condenser Gooseneck MicrophoneCardioidCondenser, gooseneckPulpit and lectern. Aim it at the mouth, not the chest.
Shure MX412/S Supercardioid Condenser Microphone, 12" Gooseneck with Attached XLR Preamp, Shock & Flange Mount, Snap-Fit Foam WindscreenSupercardioidCondenser, gooseneckA pulpit with a wedge or a nearby main loudspeaker.
Audio-Technica U857QL Cardioid Condenser Quick-Mount Gooseneck MicrophoneCardioidCondenser, gooseneckLectern work with a quick-mount base.
Audio-Technica PRO49QL Propoint Gooseneck MicrophoneCardioidCondenser, gooseneckBudget pulpit position.
Shure MX202 Overhead Microphone - Black, Cardioid Condenser Mic with 3 Pin XLR Connector, Preamp Included (MX202B/C)CardioidCondenser, overheadHanging over a choir or a platform.
Audio-Technica U853R Cardioid Condenser Hanging Microphone 250 Ohms, Low Profile DesignCardioidCondenser, hangingChoir arrays. Three across a typical loft.
Audio-Technica PRO 45W ProPoint Cardioid Condenser Hanging MicrophoneCardioidCondenser, hangingBudget choir hanging microphone.
Audio-Technica PRO 35 Cardioid Condenser Clip-on Instrument MicrophoneCardioidCondenser, clip-onBrass, woodwind and strings that move while playing.
Shure SM35 Performance Headset Condenser Microphone - TQGCardioidCondenser, headsetA preaching headset on a wired or wireless bodypack.
Shure PGA31-TQG Wireless Headworn Condenser MicrophoneCardioidCondenser, headsetBudget headset for drama and kids ministry.
Countryman E6 Directional Earset Microphone for Vocals with 2mm Cable and TA4F Connector for Shure Wireless - Light BeigDirectionalCondenser, earsetThe discreet option for broadcast and video work.
Shure Centraverse CVL Lavalier Condenser MicrophoneOmnidirectionalCondenser, lavalierSeated interviews only. The worst possible choice near a wedge.

Patterns are as published by the manufacturer for each model. Where a church is choosing between two otherwise similar handhelds, the pattern difference is worth roughly 1 dB of gain before feedback between cardioid and hypercardioid, which is real but smaller than the difference good placement makes.

What the specification does not tell you about patterns

A polar pattern is frequency dependent. The neat heart shape printed on a data sheet is the pattern at one frequency, usually around 1 kHz. Almost every directional microphone becomes progressively closer to omnidirectional as frequency falls, because the capsule is small compared with the wavelength. Below about 200 Hz a cardioid rejects very little, which is why low frequency feedback and stage rumble are so much harder to control than the midrange ring the pattern handles well.

Proximity effect comes with directionality. Every pattern except omnidirectional boosts low frequencies as the source gets closer, and the effect is stronger on tighter patterns. A hypercardioid an inch from a singer’s mouth can add 10 dB or more below 200 Hz. That is why a vocalist who eats the microphone sounds boomy and a vocalist who backs off sounds thin, and why a high pass filter on every vocal channel is standard practice rather than a repair.

Off-axis sound is coloured, not just quieter. The rejection figure describes level, not tone. Sound arriving from 90 degrees on a typical cardioid is not simply 6 dB down, it is 6 dB down and noticeably duller, because the high frequencies fall off faster than the midrange. This is what makes a choir sound distant and muffled when the microphones are aimed badly, and it is why an inexpensive microphone with a smooth off-axis response often outperforms an expensive one with a ragged one on a busy platform.

Handling noise and wind sensitivity rise with directionality. A directional capsule works by letting sound reach both sides of the diaphragm through rear ports, and those ports also admit breath blasts and handling vibration. An omnidirectional capsule is sealed and is dramatically better in both respects, which is the genuine reason omnidirectional lavaliers remain common despite their feedback disadvantage.

Where this chart does not apply

It assumes a diffuse, reverberant field. The gain before feedback figures are theoretical advantages in a room where reflected energy arrives from all directions equally. Real sanctuaries are not diffuse, and a microphone that happens to be pointed at a hard rear wall can perform worse than the table suggests while one in a treated room performs better.

Placement beats pattern, every time. Halving the distance from a source to a microphone gains 6 dB, which equals or exceeds the entire advantage of moving from omnidirectional to hypercardioid. A cardioid two inches from a mouth outperforms a hypercardioid a foot away in every respect. Pattern is the last refinement, not the first fix. See how to eliminate feedback in a church.

It does not describe boundary microphones fully. A half-cardioid on a hard surface gains about 6 dB from the surface itself, because direct and reflected sound arrive in phase, and it avoids the comb filtering a conventional microphone suffers near a boundary. That gain is in addition to the pattern advantage and is why a boundary microphone can outperform its polar plot.

Tighter is not automatically better. A hypercardioid has a live rear lobe only 6 dB down, so pointing one straight at a rear wall behind the platform can be worse than a cardioid. Very tight patterns also demand consistent technique, which volunteer vocalists and guest speakers do not reliably have.

It says nothing about in-ear monitoring. Once the wedges are gone, the pattern argument largely evaporates and the choice returns to tone and handling. That is the strongest practical case for in-ear monitors over floor wedges on a crowded platform.

Sources

  • Random energy efficiency and distance factor values for standard polar patterns, from established microphone engineering practice
  • Published polar pattern specifications from manufacturer data sheets for the microphones listed
  • Gain before feedback relationship, ten times the base ten logarithm of the reciprocal of random energy efficiency

Frequently asked questions

Which microphone polar pattern is best for church?

Cardioid for most handheld vocals, because it rejects 20 dB or more from directly behind and tolerates imperfect technique. Supercardioid or hypercardioid where a platform is loud and needs more gain before feedback, at the cost of a live rear lobe and less forgiving placement. Omnidirectional only where feedback is not a concern, such as a seated interview.

Where do I put the monitor wedge for a supercardioid mic?

Two wedges at 126 degrees from the front of the microphone, which is 54 degrees either side of directly behind. A single wedge placed straight back sits in the rear lobe, where a supercardioid is only about 12 dB down, and that is the single most common reason a Beta 58A delivers less gain than expected on a church platform.

How much extra volume does a directional microphone give?

About 4.8 dB for a cardioid over an omnidirectional, 5.7 dB for a supercardioid and 6.0 dB for a hypercardioid, measured as gain before feedback in a diffuse field. Those are real decibels but they arrive only if the null is actually aimed at the loudspeaker. A badly aimed hypercardioid performs like an omni with worse handling noise.

Why does my microphone sound boomy when someone holds it close?

Proximity effect, which every directional pattern has and tighter patterns have more of. Close to the source, low frequencies are boosted, often by 10 dB or more below 200 Hz an inch from the mouth. It is not a fault. A high pass filter on every vocal channel is standard practice, and it is why vocalists who vary their distance sound inconsistent.

Is a hypercardioid always better than a cardioid?

No. A hypercardioid has a live rear lobe only about 6 dB down, so aiming one at a hard rear wall or a main loudspeaker behind the platform can perform worse than a cardioid. It also demands consistent technique that volunteer vocalists and guest speakers often do not have. The extra 1.2 dB is smaller than the difference good placement makes.

Does a polar pattern work the same at all frequencies?

No, and this is the most useful caveat on the page. The pattern printed on a data sheet is measured at around 1 kHz, and almost every directional microphone becomes closer to omnidirectional as frequency falls. Below about 200 Hz a cardioid rejects very little, which is exactly why low frequency feedback and stage rumble are harder to control than midrange ring.

Researched, not professional advice. This page is compiled from published manufacturer specifications, operator manuals, FCC rules, published standards and owner-review consensus, not hands-on testing. Sound system design, rigging loudspeakers overhead, and any electrical work are jobs for a qualified professional: have flown loudspeakers and their attachment points signed off by a structural engineer or a certified rigger, and have all wiring done by a licensed electrician to your local code. Wireless microphone rules change, so confirm the current FCC position before buying. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.